JDPFu.com 2025

The LXDE-based Ubuntu release for low powered systems will be officially supported by Canonical according to this announcement

I’m not certain if this is good or bad. There are some things that I’d like to see updated in Lubuntu , but I definitely don’t want to see some of the new features without a way to fall back to the old way.

Some advice for Canonical – remember that people use Lubuntu for stability first and lower system resource requirements. Any changes that impact those 2 main items need to be carefully considered.

You may want to try out the 11.04 Lubuntu release.

I like the latest Ubuntu Natty 11.04, but it doesn’t like my system. It locked up much too often to be used here. That’s too bad because I became addicted to the quick launch using keyboard shortcuts. Addicted.

So after the last crash running unity-2D, I gave up on Unity, 11.04, and started using my LXDE-based Ubuntu 10.04 again. I missed those built-in keyboard quick launchers enough to look up how to create them. It was pretty easy to add them to LXDE. I suspect it is possible to do similar settings for Gnome-based desktops, but the examples below will not work for stock gnome.

A first look at Natty Narwhal, aka Ubuntu 11.04, under VirtualBox 4.0.6. I’m coming from this as a daily user of Lubuntu 10.04 LTS. I don’t use Gnome much as I find it bloated and slow.

I’ve been using Natty for about a week. In general, I like the new interface. It isn’t nearly as big a change as others would have you think. It is easy to change to a different interface like the old Gnome or even the Unity-2D for the graphics impaired machines, like mine. Give it a week and learn the keyboard shortcuts, I think you’ll like it. I found myself trying to use them on my non-Natty systems and missing those shortcuts when they weren’t available. That says something to me.

Sure I’m a little late, but I recently discovered the Panucci Resuming Player for Nokia N800/N810/N900 internet tablets. I’ve tried music playback programs and have always been disappointed since they didn’t support 30 second skip forward, backwards or resume after power off exactly where I was previously. Panucci does all these things.

Gnome3 was released this week. I usually don’t try new releases, since I prefer to let others find the issues, report them and wait for the fixes. After reading an article over at LifeHacker and seeing all the unknown questions about gnome3, I decided to grab an ISO and give it a try. Below is a very short look.

With the release of Gnome 3 and pending next version of Ubuntu running Unity, there are many things changing in the Linux GUI world.

When you run a business, you will probably need to scan documents and store them into a document management system. Often, those document scans become completely unsearchable since the text is not included for the DMS to index. Entering metadata for each document becomes critical, especially keywords that someone else will likely use to find the document later.

Xsane for Scanning

I’ve been scanning using xsane on Ubuntu/Lubuntu for a few years. The Brother All-in-1 MFC-240C in my home office is used for faxing and scans. It was found and worked just as expected. It runs as a normal user, not root and no sudo needed. It is a great, home-use sheet fed scanner.

Improved Scanning + OCR With gscan2pdf

Installation was uneventful. The standard install method for Ubuntu/APT worked and brought in necessary dependencies.

sudo apt-get install gscan2pdf

Next I tried to run the application as a normal user – I wasn’t hopeful, since whenever you connect to hardware, there are probably group permissions that need to be worked out. Since I’d already been scanning with the same user using xsane, I was cautiously optimistic. It didn’t work – got stuck scanning for the scanner hardware and properties. Ok, so perhaps it needs the first run to setup the hardware as root –

sudo gscan2pdf

As each page was scanned, a thumbnail was displayed in the left border and the main page area showed the scan for page 1.

OCR – Optical Character Recognition

I don’t recall whether the OCR was a checkbox or automatically included in the job. I do recall there were choices for where the text would be placed inside the resulting PDF. I chose to place the text under the image for the page, other options were before or after. With that choice, text searches would locate the correct page. At the bottom of each scanned page is an area with the text results of the OCR process. For the first page, the word accuracy was about 90% with many consistent mistakes. 90% accuracy sounds better than it turns out to be. To correct 10% of the words on a page takes longer than I would have liked. There is no spell checker built into this tool, so I copied each page of text into LibreOffice and used that spell checker to correct the problems. Some of the OCR created words that are in the dictionary, but didn’t make any sense in context. This is a common issue for OCR. The good news is that the PDF file has the fairly high resolution scan which definitely shows the words just as you’d expect.

The Results

I’ve found a new scanning tool. It works and creates image-based PDF files. At this point, the only drawback is that running this tool without elevated privileges doesn’t work, at least not so far. For most home users, this is a minor issue.

I forgot to mention that I ran this program over an ssh -X connection. No issues.

Whether the Do Not Track settings have any legal support or not, it is worth enabling this for anyone who would like to tell websites not to track them. It may be a worthless effort, but thankfully, it doesn’t take much effort, so why not?

On my Linux system, running Firefox 4.0, the Tell web sites I do not want to be tracked setting, yes, that is the exact wording, is under the Advanced tab of the General tab in the Firefox Preferences.

Steps:

• Edit
•   Preferences
•     Advanced
•       General
• then under the Browsing heading, check box to Tell web sites I do not want to be tracked
  
  Simple.

On other operating systems, it should be easy to find.

KeePassX is my password manager of choice.
Enigmail is the GnuPG signature and encryption add-on for Thunderbird.
Pinentry is used by Enigmail to enable secure entry of PINs, passwords and pass phrases. It blocks copy/paste and forces all keyboard entry into the pinentry textfield. That’s great if you have trivial or easily typed pass phrases. I do not.

These are all fantastic, until you depend on KeePassX to hold non-trivial pass phrases to gain access to your certificates. Since pinentry doesn’t allow copy/paste, there is a major issue. If your passphrase is non-trivial and long, then manually entering them whenever you need to read or send a sensitive email is beyond a hassle. It sucks. pinentry also grabs both the keyboard and copy/paste events, so you are probably unable to alt-tab to the window you really need. Anything typed on the system gets placed into the pinentry text field. How rude.

Workaround

There is a workaround – it is a hassle, but better than trying to type 50 characters of assorted keys.

Use the Perform Autotype option by mousing for your specific KeePassX entry. Doing this means that the Userid needs to be empty and you need to already have KeePassX unlocked before you begin any encryption work. Using the mouse to cause the paste/autotype works.

You’ll probably want to setup gpg-agent to hold your keys for a while too. Anything to avoid going through this crap to retype pass phrases for certificate access.

I’m running Enigmail v1.1.2, Pinentry-gtk2 v0.7.6 and Thunderbird v3.1.8.

I’ve been having issues with the X/Windows on the system that I’d like to use for a desktop. After trying different drivers and new drivers, I decided that the GeForce 7600 GS may not be up to the task. While getting a haircut, I looked across the street to see … Microcenter. It was loudly calling me to buy a new video card.

GPU Selection

I’d done some research and built a list of reasonable cards for consideration. $50 was my target price. Now I’m staring at a wall filled with nVidia and ATI cards. I really wanted a GT 440, but they didn’t have any in my price range. They did have hundreds of GT 430s – some in my price range and there was a $48 GeForce 9800 GT. This was ideal, but the GT 430 was intriguing. I needed to know more, so I asked the youngest guy there who looked like a nerd to help. He pulled up a GPU comparison website and was entering 9800/430. They were very comparable, the GT 430 was just a tad slower, but it used half the power and supported DirectX 11. Lots of thinking – ok, I’ll get it now and if the card appears to be crap when I perform my research at home, then I can return it. Research done. I’d gotten lucky with this card, especially for the $54AR price.